Archive for the ‘Creation’ Category

Answers in Genesis (AIG), files Religious Discrimination lawsuit

February 5, 2015

Advertisements

FROM EVOLUTION TO CREATION

July 6, 2014

This video contains Dr. Parker’s testimony of how God turned him from evolution to creation (will also talk about biology and geography)

 

Hidden World of Africa: Wasp Nest

July 2, 2014

The Hidden World of Africa: Dung Beetle

July 2, 2014

Dark History of Evolution-Henry Morris

June 26, 2014

Raging Waters – Evidence of the Genesis Flood in Australia

June 26, 2014

Inventor of the MRI Scanner – Can Creationists Be “Real” Scientists?

June 8, 2014

More info:

Can Creationists Be “Real” Scientists?

https://answersingenesis.org/creation-scientists/can-creationists-be-real-scientists/

DID GOD CREATE IN 6 LITERAL DAYS?

June 6, 2014

Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

Exodus 31:17 It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.

Genesis 2:1-3 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

 

 

Dr. James S. Allan says: “As a biologist in the field of population and quantitative genetics, I had believed in the theory of evolution for nearly 40 years. … When, at a fairly advanced stage of my career, I became a Christian I began to read the Bible reverently and as intelligently as I was able. … I must admit that the six days of the creation presented some difficulty for me. The apparent logic of conclusions from observations and measurements in various fields of science had previously led me to doubt the little I had known of the Word of God, to the extent that I had agreed with attempts to replace it with an alternative concept of God. But God does not say aeons or years or months or weeks–he says days, and we generally understand days to be 24-hour periods. I then realized that had God wanted to say a billion years rather than six days, He could have said it … I now believe that God means literally what He says and writes, and that there is no reason to look for symbolism. … It is also clear to me that if one wishes to believe in the theory of evolution, a great deal of Scripture, including Jesus’ own spoken word (Matt. 19:4; 25:34; Mark 13:19; John 5:46-47), has to be discounted, so, whom must we believe, God or man? I believe that God gives us the answer when He says, ‘Stop trusting in man, who has but a breath in his nostrils. Of what account is he?’ (Isa. 2:22)” (In Six Days, edited by John Ashton p. 127, 128, 133). [Emphasis Added]

(Dr. James S. Allan is a former senior lecturer in genetics at the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa. He holds a B.S. in agriculture from the University of Natal, an M.S. in agriculture from the University of Stellenbosch and a Ph.D. in genetics from the University of Edinburgh, Scotland. He currently serves as an international consultant in the field of dairy cattle breeding.)

Dr. John Baumgardner says “Despite all the millions of pages of evolutionist publications–from journal articles to textbooks to popular magazine stories–which assume and imply that material processes are entirely adequate to accomplish macroevolutionary miracles, there is in reality no rational basis for such belief. It is utter fantasy. Coded language structures are non-material in nature and absolutely require a non-material explanation. Just as there has been glaring scientific fraud in things biological for the past century, there has been a similar fraud in things geological. The error, in a word, is uniformitarianism. … Just as materialist biologists have erroneously assumed that material processes can give rise to life in all its diversity, materialist geologists have assumed that the present can fully account for the earth’s past. In so doing, they have been forced to ignore and suppress abundant contrary evidence that the planet has suffered major catastrophe on a global scale. … As a Christian who is also a professional scientist, I exult in the reality that ‘in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth’ (Exod. 20:11). May He forever be praised” (In Six Days, pp. 230, 231, 239). [Emphasis added]

(Dr. Baumgardner is a technical staff member in the theoretical division of Los Alamos National Laboratory. He holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Texas Tech University, an M.S. in electrical engineering from Princeton University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in geophysics and space physics from UCLA. Dr. Baumgardner is the chief developer of the TERRA code, a 3-D finite element program for modeling the earth’s mantle and lithosphere. His current research is in the areas of planetary mantle dynamics and the development of efficient hydrodynamic methods for supercomputers.)

 

“There are many reasons why we reject the day-age theory or any theory that allows for billions of years of earth history. First, the attempt to reconcile the Bible with the massive geological age theories of evolution destroys the authority of the Bible, because it plainly teaches a literal six-day creation. In the Law of Moses, the days of creation are likened to the sabbath, which obviously refers to a literal 24-hour day (Exodus 20:10-11). Second, the Bible’s genealogies do not allow for mankind to be older than about 10,000 years. Third, the evolutionary dating methods are based on evolutionary assumptions, such as uniformitarianism, and are therefore unreliable and should never be used to overthrow the Bible’s witness. Fourth, there is a large and growing body of scientific evidence pointing to a young earth. Fifth, the Bible says that death did not enter into God’s creation until the fall of man (Romans 5:12), whereas progressive creationism and every type of evolution says that death existed prior to man and has been the major means of “progress.” Sixth, if the first three chapters of Genesis are not literal, the fall of man is not literal and the sacrifice of Christ was a meaningless event. In fact, if Genesis 1-3 is not literal history, the rest of the Bible makes no sense.” [Emphasis in original]

– David Cloud

 

A SUMMARY OF WHY WE REJECT THE GAP THEORY (from Willmington’s Guide to the Bible):

(1) It is UNSCIENTIFIC. The gap theory was (in part) an attempt to reconcile the creation account with the long periods of time in the theory of evolution. But evolution itself as a theory is totally unscientific, defying the second law of thermodynamics [that the universe is in the process of decay and decline rather than in a process of evolving upwardly].

(2) It is UNSCRIPTURAL. Paul states in Romans 5:12 and 8:20-22 that man’s sin brought about death, even of animals. But the gap theory would have Adam walking on top of a gigantic fossilized animal graveyard!

(3) It is UNNECESSARY. The most natural interpretation of Gen. 1 and 2 is taking it at face value, without addition or subtraction. Gen. 1:1 thus becomes a summary statement of creation. In the first verse God tells us what he did. In the remaining verses He tells us how He did it.


 

 

 

Biologos Funds Projects To Undermine The Authority of The Word of God

http://worldviewweekend.com/article/biologos-funds-projects-undermine-authority-word-god

Cosmos, Creator and Human Destiny

May 20, 2014

Evolution–Is it “The Greatest Show on Earth,” as celebrated atheist author Richard Dawkins proclaims–or has it become a “Big Top Circus,” paraded from town to town and school to school? Scientifically, both Creation and Evolution cannot be true. Quite simply, then, one of these belief systems is nothing more than a cruel “side show” perpetrated upon unsuspecting children and adults of all ages–while the other alone is meritorious of praise. Darwin and Dawkins both credit “natural selection” for the incredible diversity and complexity of life on earth. Can random chance processes explain the masterfully orchestrated performance of earth’s breathtaking complexity and unparalleled majesty? Due to the influence of biblical Christianity, evolution was once almost unanimously rejected by the entire Western world, especially by leading scientists, a fact easily documented by citing Christians who are still looked to as the founders of modern science. Isaac Newton gave us the most important scientific book ever written: Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Yet he wrote more about the Bible than about science. Robert Boyle is known as the first modern chemist and is credited with laying the foundation of modern chemistry. His book, The Skeptical Chymist was a cornerstone work of modern chemistry. He endowed a lecture series, “The Boyle Lectures” (ironically still carried on at Oxford University, where Dawkins held forth as professor), “for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels.” In his latest impeccably-researched volume, Dave Hunt skillfully dethrones the Darwinian imagination that has exalted itself against the knowledge of God–and in the process, reveals fatal flaws in the logic of both cosmic and secular humanism. But this myth-busting volume is not typical of Creationist literature in recent decades. It reaches far deeper than science can look, probing the heart and mind to provide soul-shaking answers to the questions of human destiny that have not only plagued atheists and skeptics, but even most Bible-believing Christians.

(Cosmos, Creator, and Human DestinyBook Sold Here:       https://www.thebereancall.org/content/cosmos-creator-and-human-destiny-2)

Lions on the Hunt

May 13, 2014

Psalms 104:21 The young lions roar after their prey, and seek their meat from God.

In the spiritual sense believers have lions:

Psalms 57:4 My soul is among lions: and I lie even among them that are set on fire, even the sons of men, whose teeth are spears and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword.